Friday, September 05, 2008

False labour?

My wife reported this morning that she was in 'false labour'. It began at about 3AM, and the reason it's called false labour is that while the contractions were pretty much equally spaced, they were of different durations.

In real labour, the contractions are evenly spaced but get consistently longer, this wasn't the case.

Still, this false labour may be a precursor to real labour? Let's hope so.

More news as I get it...

No comments: